Cargo Facts

No products in the cart.

SUBSCRIBE
  • NEWS
  • AI TOOL
  • INSIGHTS DATA
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • FEATURES
  • LIVE EVENTS
  • VIRTUAL EVENTS
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
    • Webinar Library
  • PODCAST
  • CONSULTING
Monday, August 3, 2026
Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Freighter Transactions
  • Capacity & Demand
  • Conversions
  • Carriers
  • Routes
  • AAM
  • The Future
  • Cybersecurity
Cargo Facts
  • NEWS
  • AI TOOL
  • INSIGHTS DATA
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • FEATURES
  • LIVE EVENTS
  • VIRTUAL EVENTS
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
    • Webinar Library
  • PODCAST
  • CONSULTING
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Cargo Facts
No Result
View All Result

UPS: American businesses forgoing billions in cross-border e-commerce

Lewis KingbyLewis King
May 31, 2017
in Capacity & Demand, E-Commerce, News, Technology
0
Share on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Cross-border trade is still where the smart money is in the e-commerce market, but American businesses are largely missing out on this growth opportunity. Tandem reports released by UPS suggest that trade policies and attitudes in the United States are costing domestic businesses billions of dollars in lost revenues from cross-border e-commerce and trade.

If Americans don’t look beyond their own borders, they will lose out to countries such as China, which have embraced the economic reality of global trade. With, global e-commerce sales are projected to reach US$4 trillion by 2020, this market represents what UPS calls a “tremendous growth opportunity.”

In a second report, UPS found that almost half of the economies along the north-south air cargo trade lane in the Western Hemisphere are looking for new international suppliers, suggesting that “there is an opportunity for exporters to find new buyers,” according to the 2017 UPS “Business Monitor Export Index Latin America” (BMEI) report.

UPS found that, despite the immense potential of cross-border e-commerce (1.6 billion digital buyers worldwide), less than 1 percent of America’s 30 million companies export. A lot of these companies are mom-and-pop businesses, where it’s not viable to do so, but China’s global export share climbed to 14.6 percent in 2015, well ahead of America’s 8.9 percent.

Taken in conjunction, the two reports suggest a that U.S. business of all sizes are far less global than one would expect, given the country’s strong neoliberal political bent of over the last four-plus decades – the current administration aside.

U.S.-based Importers surveyed by UPS were the least proactive, with “one out of three (31 percent) indicating they do not contact suppliers.”

While extending international supply chains is a more complex (but potentially cost-saving affair), UPS suggested three ways that U.S. businesses could get in on the cross-border e-commerce game.

 

  • Offer a localized shopping experience that includes regional content control, pricing and promotions, language translations and currency conversions.
  • Streamlined international logistics, including delivery within 2-8 business days
  • Specialized customer service, including international returns solutions and multilingual agents.

 

The U.S. is blessed with one of the most linguistically diverse populations in the word, which in a global market is an asset that should be leveraged. Meanwhile, UPS found that 43 percent of global consumers were willing to shop internationally for unique non-local products. With 80 percent of global purchasing power beyond U.S. borders, it makes sense to think globally.

 

Tags: ACNChina-US tradee-commerceTradeU.S. tradeUPS
Previous Post

German online forwarder expands Cargonexx platform in Europe

Next Post

April air freight growth: has acceleration peaked?

Related Posts

De Havilland Dash 8-400
Leasing

Podcast: Thrust Capital to enter regional freighter lease sector with Dash 8-Q400s

July 31, 2026
Ascent Aviation Services Marana
Freighter Aircraft

World Star to launch IAI Big Twin conversion line at Ascent

July 30, 2026
Freighter aircraft
Capacity & Demand

Capacity index growth levels off in June, July

July 30, 2026
Next Post

April air freight growth: has acceleration peaked?

Please login to join discussion

Cargo Facts Free Newsletters

Cargo Facts Connect Podcast

  • About Us
  • Help Center
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Usage Terms
  • ADA Compliance
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • The Dahl Scholarship

 [wt_cli_manage_consent]

Follow Us

twitter linkedin podcast podcast podcast
© 2026 Royal Media
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Freighter Transactions
    • Capacity & Demand
    • Conversions
    • Carriers
    • Routes
    • AAM
    • The Future
  • Insights Data
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • AI Tool
  • Features
  • Live Events
  • Virtual Events
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
  • Podcast
  • Consulting
  • Subscribe
  • Log In / Account

© 2022 Royal Media & Cargo Facts

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Freighter Transactions
    • Capacity & Demand
    • Conversions
    • Carriers
    • Routes
    • AAM
    • The Future
  • Insights Data
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • AI Tool
  • Features
  • Live Events
  • Virtual Events
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
  • Podcast
  • Consulting
  • Subscribe
  • Log In / Account

© 2022 Royal Media & Cargo Facts