Cargo Facts

No products in the cart.

SUBSCRIBE
  • NEWS
  • AI TOOL
  • INSIGHTS DATA
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • FEATURES
  • LIVE EVENTS
  • VIRTUAL EVENTS
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
    • Webinar Library
  • PODCAST
  • CONSULTING
Friday, July 17, 2026
Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Freighter Transactions
  • Capacity & Demand
  • Conversions
  • Carriers
  • Routes
  • AAM
  • The Future
  • Cybersecurity
Cargo Facts
  • NEWS
  • AI TOOL
  • INSIGHTS DATA
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • FEATURES
  • LIVE EVENTS
  • VIRTUAL EVENTS
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
    • Webinar Library
  • PODCAST
  • CONSULTING
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Cargo Facts
No Result
View All Result

U.S. Supreme Court rejects UPS’ appeal to raise postal rates

Randy WoodsbyRandy Woods
May 21, 2019
in Archive, Carriers, E-Commerce, Express, News, Routes
0
Share on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

In a move that is being considered a win for Amazon, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from United Parcel Service (UPS) that would have required the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to raise the prices it charges for package delivery. The USPS has an agreement with Amazon to deliver the vast majority of its packages.

UPS had argued to the High Court that the postal service’s deal with Amazon gives the e-tail giant an unfair advantage by charging lower prices for package delivery. UPS said, “postal pricing has departed from Congress’ requirement that the Postal Service compete on a level playing field with private companies for package delivery.”

In its rejection of the appeal of United Parcel Service v. Postal Regulatory Commission, the Court said it did not agree with UPS that the USPS operated under an unfair pricing model, siding with a previous appellate court ruling declaring that the pricing model was valid.

The U.S. Congress used to have the power to regulate postal rates until 1970, when the Postal Regulatory Commission was given authority to establish price floors for products where the USPS faces significant market competition. By establishing this policy, the commission prevents the postal service from using revenues from its monopoly on letter delivery – which must be sent to every town in the country – to subsidize the delivery packages, where it competes with private couriers.

A spokesperson for the Postal Regulatory Commission said the body welcomed the decision, “which affirms the improvements the commission has made to its established costing methodology.”

UPS said it was “disappointed” with the Court’s rejection of its appeal, but added that it would “continue to work with the Postal Regulatory Commission to advocate for transparent cost accounting at the USPS.”

The USPS pricing model for package delivery, however, may still be subject to change, as it has come under fire from U.S. President Donald Trump, who said Amazon is being charged artificially low prices as e-commerce demand grows. Trump has requested a review of the postal commission’s pricing model that he said is draining the postal service and making “Amazon richer.”

Meanwhile, Amazon has been increasing its investments in establishing its own package delivery operation, with CEO Jeff Bezos attending last week’s groundbreaking on a $1.5 billion air hub in Kentucky. Amazon has a 50-year lease for a 900-acre facility at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG).

Tags: ACNair cargo ratesAmazonCincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG)U.S. Postal Service (USPS)UPS
Previous Post

747F era coming to an end at EVA Air Cargo

Next Post

ACE Belgium Freighters denies ‘ACE’ trademark claim in DOT response

Related Posts

Aloha Air Cargo 737-400F
Fleets

World Star signs 1st 737-400F deal with Saltchuk Aviation

July 16, 2026
Challenge Group 777-300ERSF
Routes

Challenge Group prepares for 2nd 777-300ERSF delivery amid network expansion

July 16, 2026
Mammoth Freighters 777-200LRMF
Freighter Aircraft

First Chinese 777 conversion site emerges in Mammoth deal with STAECO

July 15, 2026
Next Post
A CAL Cargo 747-400F. Photo: CAL Cargo

ACE Belgium Freighters denies ‘ACE’ trademark claim in DOT response

Cargo Facts Free Newsletters

Cargo Facts Connect Podcast

  • About Us
  • Help Center
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Usage Terms
  • ADA Compliance
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • The Dahl Scholarship

 [wt_cli_manage_consent]

Follow Us

twitter linkedin podcast podcast podcast
© 2026 Royal Media
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Freighter Transactions
    • Capacity & Demand
    • Conversions
    • Carriers
    • Routes
    • AAM
    • The Future
  • Insights Data
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • AI Tool
  • Features
  • Live Events
  • Virtual Events
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
  • Podcast
  • Consulting
  • Subscribe
  • Log In / Account

© 2022 Royal Media & Cargo Facts

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Freighter Transactions
    • Capacity & Demand
    • Conversions
    • Carriers
    • Routes
    • AAM
    • The Future
  • Insights Data
    • Cargo Facts Insights Overview
    • Dashboard
  • AI Tool
  • Features
  • Live Events
  • Virtual Events
    • Cyber Aviation Global Forum
  • Podcast
  • Consulting
  • Subscribe
  • Log In / Account

© 2022 Royal Media & Cargo Facts